
By , giwa alex, Jos
Proceedings in the Plateau State High Court, Court 9, were on Thursday halted at a crucial stage as the arraignment of suspects linked to the Angwan Rukuba killings could not proceed to plea,
following the absence of legal representation for the defendants.
The case, which drew significant public attention, came before Honourable Justice J.D. Fomyil, with expectations that the accused persons would formally enter their pleas over allegations tied to the March 29th, 2026 attack that claimed over 30 lives in Angwan Rukuba, Jos North Local Government Area.
However, in a measured ruling anchored on due process, the court deferred further proceedings to April 30th, 2026, directing that the defendants must be represented by counsel to enable the case move forward in line with established legal standards.
The court session marks a critical step in the legal response to the Angwan Rukuba violence, an incident that sent shockwaves across Plateau State and beyond.
The attack, which left dozens dead and several others injured, prompted swift federal intervention.

During a visit to the state shortly after the incident, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu issued a directive to security agencies to ensure that those responsible were identified and brought before the law. Acting on this directive, the Department of State Services (DSS) carried out coordinated operations, leading to the arrest of the suspects between April 3rd and April 10th, 2026.
With arrests secured, the Plateau State Government moved to initiate prosecution within the state, marking a notable shift from previous practice where such cases were often handled outside Plateau.
At Thursday’s sitting, the prosecution, led by the Solicitor-General of Plateau State, Joel Takbal, presented the defendants before the court. The immediate objective was clear ,to take their pleas and set the stage for trial.

That step, however, could not be taken, as the defendants appeared without counsel.
Explaining the development, Takbal noted that proceeding under such circumstances would undermine procedural fairness, making adjournment inevitable.
The court, aligning with this position, fixed April 30th for continuation, by which time the defendants are expected to have secured legal representation.
The charges presented before Court 9 outline a sequence of alleged offences connected to the Angwan Rukuba attack.
According to the prosecution, the defendants are accused of :
Criminal conspiracy, involving the alleged planning and coordination of the attack;

Acts relating to terrorism, including organizing, facilitating, and supporting the assault on the community;
Culpable homicide, arising from the deaths recorded during the incident;
Illegal possession of firearms and ammunition, tied to the weapons reportedly used in carrying out the attack.
The prosecution maintains that the actions attributed to the defendants contributed directly to the fatalities and destruction witnessed during the attack.
While Court 9 is handling the Angwan Rukuba-related charges, the prosecution disclosed that one of the defendants is also facing separate proceedings before another court over additional allegations.

These include offences said to have occurred between 2025 and early 2026 across Riyom, Barkin Ladi, and parts of Jos South Local Government Areas. The charges in that instance similarly relate to violent incidents distinct from, but preceding, the Angwan Rukuba case.
This dual-track prosecution, according to the Solicitor-General, reflects the scope of allegations linked to the individual concerned.
In the interim, the defendants remain in the custody of the DSS, a measure the prosecution says is intended to support ongoing investigative processes and ensure continuity in the case.

Takbal emphasized that the decision to bring the suspects before a Plateau-based court underscores a renewed approach to handling such matters within the state, supported by collaboration between federal authorities, state government, and security agencies.
With proceedings now adjourned, attention shifts to the next hearing date, when the court is expected to take the pleas of the defendants and formally open the trial phase.


























































































































































































































































































































































































































You must be logged in to post a comment.