
By, Paul James.
Fresh political tremors are unsettling the corridors of power in Plateau State, as mounting allegations of divided loyalty within Governor Caleb Mutfwang’s political structure spark intense debate among stakeholders and party loyalists.
According to sources within the state’s political circles, the roots of the unfolding tension trace back to an earlier phase of political recalibration, when questions reportedly emerged over internal alignment following shifts involving the All Progressives Congress (APC).
Insiders claim that some individuals who now occupy strategic advisory and political positions were initially resistant to aspects of the governor’s political direction at the time.
Though they later appeared to align publicly after internal party dynamics evolved, whispers of lingering dissent allegedly persisted beneath the surface.
In recent weeks, speculation intensified with claims that certain aides may be engaging in discreet consultations with figures associated with the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Plateau State.
Particular attention has been drawn to political actors linked to Raymond Dabo, though no official confirmation has substantiated the nature or intent of such reported engagements.
While these claims remain unverified, they have fueled concerns about the possibility of parallel political interests operating within the same administrative structure.
The debate took a sharper turn following allegations tied to the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC).
Critics allege that there may be efforts to consolidate opposition platforms under PDP influence ahead of the 2027 electoral cycle.
Adding to the controversy are unconfirmed reports regarding the alleged diversion of logistics support originally intended for IPAC-related activities.
Though no formal evidence has been presented publicly, the mere suggestion has amplified scrutiny and political suspicion.
Political analysts warn that if any element of dual allegiance were proven, it could raise serious ethical and strategic concerns for the administration.
“Dual political loyalty within a governing structure, if substantiated, presents both moral and operational challenges,” a senior party stakeholder who requested anonymity observed.
However, others caution against premature conclusions, suggesting the unfolding narrative may also reflect broader political repositioning typical of pre-election cycles.
As the speculation gathers momentum, several pressing questions dominate public discourse :
Is Governor Mutfwang fully aware of the alleged internal maneuverings ?
Are there genuine fractures within the political camp ?
Or are the allegations part of strategic rivalry and power recalibration ahead of 2027 ?
Stakeholders across Plateau State are now calling for clarity to dispel uncertainty and protect public trust.
Party loyalists and civil society observers alike emphasize the need for transparent communication to address growing concerns.
At press time, efforts to obtain an official response from the governor’s media office were ongoing.
For now, the political atmosphere in Plateau remains charged.
Whether these allegations represent isolated political maneuvering or signal deeper structural fissures within the governor’s camp is a question that only time, and transparency,will answer.




























































































































































































































































































































































You must be logged in to post a comment.